You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
New approach for tranching/divisible assets #1358 (see also Change the way LCOX appraisal tool works #1199 and New tranching approach #1357)We don't have an agreed upon approach for capacity/tranche size selection. Unclear whether capacities should be defined upfront or dynamic (there are software design implications here, and I'd advise against mixing approaches to keep things relatively simple). Unclear how this should interact with divisible assets. Unclear what the user interface should be.
General indecision about divisible assets (which, to remind, mostly exist for the purposes of allowing partial decommissioning). Should we have a "parent" asset made up of lots of discrete units with the pre-defined capacities, something that allows for more continuous capacities (Allow for "divisible" assets with continuous capacity rather than discrete #1269), or scrap this completely and just have a collection of independent smaller assets. What should the user interface be?
Appraisal of divided assets is inefficient #1209 Related, to the above and point 1, the current approach of splitting assets into small units for re-appraisal can lead to many appraisal rounds which can be inefficient. Should we allow appraising multiple units simultaneously?
Main issues:
See sub issues below, but also look at any linked pull requests/issues for full context.