Skip to content

Poor Section Placement (pyOpenSci) , Wordy Criteria Statements , Unnecessary Extra Wording #273

@AbhiramDhanvi

Description

@AbhiramDhanvi

List of issues:
Mixed labels like:
Description
Criteria
Ascending Process
Needs a uniform structure:
Criteria
How to Apply / Advance / Graduate
Poor Section Placement (pyOpenSci)
Positioned like an appendix at the bottom.
Should be integrated as a proper main section (##).
Wordy Criteria Statements
Overly long phrases (e.g., “Must be licensed under a license approved by…”).
Should be simplified (e.g., “OSI-approved open-source license”).
Unnecessary Extra Wording
Redundant phrases like “Successful completion of”.
Should be shortened to “Completed”.

Way to fix the issues:
pyOpenSci Section Placement
Moved from an appendix-style position at the bottom
→ Integrated into the main content as a proper ## section for better visibility and flow.
Wordy Criteria Statements
Replaced long, complex phrases with shorter, clearer alternatives
→ Example: “Must be licensed under a license approved by…” → “OSI-approved open-source license”
Unnecessary Extra Wording
Removed redundant and obvious phrases
→ Example: “Successful completion of” → “Completed”

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions