|
I failed to test adding a host to cloudstack on the local server. I'm not sure what the reason is. I think my IP address configuration should be correct. I work on the management platform and host platform under the current server. They are together. I am using Cloudstack version: 4.19.0.1 My operating system: Debian 12 x64 log file |
Replies: 18 comments
|
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue template! |
|
@0xdddddddd |
Okay, please wait a few minutes. I will clear the logs, add a new host, and provide you with a new log |
|
Hello, I have kept you waiting for a long time. I have added a brand new host log, and besides that, I haven't done anything on the web UI. Unable to add the host: Cannot find the server resources at http://192.168.64.129 log file: |
|
The libvirtd configuration file, which is automatically generated by Cloudstack, has not been modified by me |
|
After my continuous investigation. I found that the kvm ok program is missing in the debian12 system. That's because cloudstack setup agent called kvm ok. In addition, I am facing a new problem |
|
Cloudstack agent has been successfully added, but it is always in an initialized state. |
this is a known UI bug: #8597 |
agent.log looks ok, although there are some errors. is the host Up ? check Infrastructure -> Hosts |
No, I don't know where the mistake was, I feel like there's still a long way to go. |
Add primary storage |
I can't add it because they will report errors. I've been working on it all day and I'm very tired. There are not enough detailed logs, the failure rate is too high. Poor system compatibility. The official installation package contains too many missing items during installation. Not easy to get started with. I feel very uncomfortable. |
|
@0xdddddddd I tried using Debian12 as a KVM host with CloudStack 4.19.0.1. |
Although successful, it's just that you can see success, and in fact, the functionality is not available. |
|
@0xdddddddd Yes, it's because the current deb packages are only tested, used and supported for Ubuntu that you're welcome to use to an out-of-box installation experience, support for Debian is largely experimental and it's possible (as you've found out the hard way) Debian needs additional packages and specific configuration. Most of us may not have any incentive to support Debian (yet), and it's hard to work on all the issues, features and requirements that each and every user wants in our 'free time'. We want to help but as much frustrating it is for you, it's equally or may be more frustrating that we can't help or support you in something that's not supported (yet). As a community-driven opensource project, our community of users help solve such problems with us and we welcome any and all feedback and contributions, and pull requests. |
















@0xdddddddd Yes, it's because the current deb packages are only tested, used and supported for Ubuntu that you're welcome to use to an out-of-box installation experience, support for Debian is largely experimental and it's possible (as you've found out the hard way) Debian needs additional packages and specific configuration.
Most of us may not have any incentive to support Debian (yet), and it's hard to work on all the issues, features and requirements that each and every user wants in our 'free time'. We want to help but as much frustrating it is for you, it's equally or may be more frustrating that we can't help or support you in something that's not supported (yet). As a community-dri…