|
Hi community! Looking for clarification on how the GitHub MCP Registry works. Server: claude-faf-mcp Questions Is github.com/mcp a curated list (vs automatic sync)? Why We Ask Previously posted: modelcontextprotocol/registry #690 Thanks for any insights! 🙏 |
Replies: 57 comments 4 replies
|
39 days, no response. claude-faf-mcp is approved by Anthropic (PR #2759 MERGED), has 10,067+ npm downloads, but isn't visible on github.com/mcp despite being listed in modelcontextprotocol/servers. What are the curation criteria for github.com/mcp? Is there a separate approval process beyond the Anthropic PR? Links: |
|
🎉 Update: Additional Milestone Since Posting
This makes claude-faf-mcp:
Full details: https://www.faf.one/blog/iana-registration Still curious about the github.com/mcp curation process and happy to |
|
Hey @Wolfe-Jam, |
|
Hey HolgerMany thanks for your reply, we will take of it and let you know. thanks again,James (Wolfe) HarrisonFounderWolfe James LLCfaf.one - Project DNA for AI contextIANA Registered format .FAF for AI context application/vnd.faf+yaml"README evolution for AI era"Google Gemini CLI(9.5/10 Rating)
On Nov 10 2025, at 8:52 am, Holger Staudacher ***@***.***> wrote:
Hey @Wolfe-Jam,
right now the GitHub MCP registry is a curated list. This will change in a couple days when we enable sync with the open source registry. In order to get your server added, you have to publish it to the open source registry first. Here is a guide how to publish your server if you haven't done it already.
—Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
|
Hey @hstaudacher - following up from November. Just published both FAF packages to the open source registry today:
Ready for sync whenever that goes live. If there's anything blocking the registry sync rollout, happy to help test, validate, or contribute. We've been through the mcp-publisher flow and can provide feedback if useful. |
|
Hey @hstaudacher — friendly follow-up from the November conversation about registry sync. Quick update on where things stand: we now have 6 FAF MCP servers published to the open source registry, all passing
All published via You mentioned back in November that github.com/mcp would start syncing from the open source registry. Is that sync live now? If so, is there something on our end we need to do to appear? If it's still in progress, totally understand — just want to make sure we're not missing a step. Happy to help test or validate anything on the sync pipeline. |
|
Status check, 2026-05-18: github.com/mcp still shows ~97 servers, so the open-source-registry sync doesn't look live yet. The FAF servers remain published & schema-clean on the OSS registry. If the list stays curated long-term: Is there an ETA for the sync, or is github.com/mcp staying curated? Either answer's fine — closing the loop on this thread. |
|
Hi @Wolfe-Jam, thanks for the thoughtful follow-up and for continuing to publish and validate your servers. A few clarifications from our side: the GitHub MCP Registry now has the ability to sync versions from the open source registry, but onboarding a new server is still a manual curation process today. Once a server has been onboarded, newly published versions from the OSS registry should sync from there. I’m closer to the technical side than the product/curation criteria, so I don’t want to overstate anything here. I’ll share your request with our product team and ask whether we’re able to move forward with onboarding them. Thanks again for your patience, and for offering to help validate the sync path. |
|
Hey @trent-j — thanks again for looking into this and for offering to take it to the product team, genuinely appreciate it. Quick update from our side: since May we've moved our two flagship servers to the FAF Foundation's DNS-verified No rush at all on the github.com/mcp side — mostly I'd love to understand the lay of the land so we can be ready: is onboarding/sync something that's moving, or staying curated for now? And if there's a process, criteria, or anything we should prep on our end to make it easy when the time comes, happy to do the legwork. Either way — thanks for keeping the channel open. 🙏 |
Onboarding request:
|
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Official registry name | io.github.edithatogo/fyi-mcp |
| Latest version | 0.1.2 (active / isLatest) |
| Repository | https://github.com/edithatogo/fyi-cli |
| server.json | https://github.com/edithatogo/fyi-cli/blob/master/server.json |
| Description | Local-first FOI/OIA request tracker MCP for Alaveteli platforms (FYI.org.nz and multi-jurisdiction catalog) |
OSS registry verification
curl -sS "https://registry.modelcontextprotocol.io/v0/servers?search=fyi-mcp"
returns io.github.edithatogo/fyi-mcp v0.1.2 active/latest.
github.com/mcp status (2026-07-09)
- Search
fyi-mcp/edithatogodoes not surface a curated card for this server https://github.com/mcp/io.github.edithatogo/fyi-mcp→ 404
Could the product/curation team please consider onboarding this server so OSS version sync can take effect? Happy to provide additional metadata or validation help.
Tracked in: edithatogo/fyi-cli#32
Onboarding request:
|
Onboarding request:
|
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Official Registry name | io.github.happy520ai/unified-ai-system |
| Latest version | 0.4.8 (active) |
| Package / transport | ghcr.io/happy520ai/unified-ai-system/mcp-server:0.4.8 / stdio |
| Repository | https://github.com/happy520ai/unified-ai-system |
| Manifest | https://github.com/happy520ai/unified-ai-system/blob/master/server.json |
| Documentation | https://happy520ai.github.io/unified-ai-system/codex-mcp-docker-quickstart.html |
Unified AI System is an Apache-2.0 self-hosted gateway that gives Codex, Cursor, Cline, and generic MCP clients nine bounded tools. Its differentiating first-run path turns rough natural-language requests into structured, reviewable prompts locally, with a deterministic fake provider and no account or API key required. Real provider calls remain explicit and disabled by default.
The repository publishes pinned OCI images and runs public CI, container, MCP discovery, security-scanner, clean-clone, and process-cleanup checks. The Official Registry currently contains versions 0.3.1 through 0.4.8; GitHub MCP search still returns no result.
Please consider onboarding this server so future Official Registry versions can sync. I am happy to provide any additional metadata or validation evidence the curation team needs.
|
Onboarding request: Following the OSS-registry-first process confirmed in this thread (publish to the open source registry, then request manual onboarding; versions sync after):
Derive gives agent output a permanent home. One call publishes a document, styled page, deck, or report to a versioned URL a teammate can open and comment on inline; the agent reads those comments back and revises. Every tool carries a title and honest Nothing to install and no key to paste — it is a remote server behind OAuth with dynamic client registration. Self-hosting is a single container, for teams that cannot send work to a hosted service. OSS registry verification: returns github.com/mcp status (2026-08-12): a search for Could the curation team consider onboarding this so future OSS registry versions sync automatically? Happy to provide any further metadata or validation. |
|
Onboarding request for a server already published to the OSS registry, following the format used earlier in this thread.
Happy to provide a populated test account for review. Thanks for considering. |
|
Requesting onboarding for a new server:
OSS registry verification: curl -s "https://registry.modelcontextprotocol.io/v0/servers?search=io.github.rafaelgaspar/longhorn-mcp"returns the server with Publishing is automated via GitHub Actions OIDC on every tagged release ( |
|
Requesting initial GitHub MCP Registry onboarding for MCP Harbor, following the OSS-registry-first, manual-curation process described in this thread.
MCP Harbor is a registry and directory of MCP servers. It mirrors the official MCP Registry and keeps it in sync, alongside listings submitted directly. Each listing carries its It exposes three tools, so an agent can do discovery without a browser:
Verification: # Active and latest in the official registry
curl -s "https://registry.modelcontextprotocol.io/v0.1/servers/io.github.lbesecker195%2Fmcp-registry-search-find-mcp-servers-discover-install-mcp-tools-directory-catalog-marketplace/versions/latest"
# Live tool list from the endpoint
curl -s -X POST https://ai.mcpharbor.dev/mcp \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-H 'Accept: application/json, text/event-stream' \
-d '{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":1,"method":"tools/list"}'Happy to supply anything else useful for curation. |
|
Onboarding request: JobsPipe — |
|
Onboarding request: co.avagama/openings Following the process clarified in this thread (OSS registry first; github.com/mcp initial onboarding is manual curation; versions sync after onboard):
OSS registry verification returns github.com/mcp status (2026-09-22)
Could the product/curation team please consider onboarding this server so OSS version sync can take effect? Happy to provide additional metadata or validation help. |
|
Onboarding request: Pressa (LaTeX to PDF) Following the process described in this thread (official registry first, then manual onboarding here):
Pressa compiles LaTeX to PDF on the server, so an agent with no local TeX Live install still gets the PDF. Failed compiles return a structured diagnosis with a suggested fix instead of a raw TeX log. Verify: Thanks! |
|
Onboarding request: Wealthnow ( This follows the process described in this thread: publish to the official registry first, then ask for manual onboarding, after which new versions sync.
Thanks! |
|
Requesting initial GitHub MCP Registry onboarding for Scout7, following the OSS-registry-first, manual-curation process described in this thread.
Run a week of organic marketing on loop from your AI agent. Scout7 plans your week from your brand, then writes SEO blogs, videos, LinkedIn carousels and social posts, schedules everything across your channels, and reports what moved — it even checks whether you're cited by ChatGPT and Claude. You approve before anything goes live. Also listed on Smithery, cursor.directory and MCP Marketplace. I'm on the Scout7 team, so flagging the relationship up front. Thanks! |
|
Requesting initial GitHub MCP Registry onboarding for TraderSpy, following the OSS-registry-first, manual-curation process described in this thread.
TraderSpy serves live crypto futures data: AI-generated signals with their realised outcomes, positioning of top traders across Binance, Hyperliquid, Bybit and OKX, prices and candles, 19 technical indicators, funding and open interest, a market screener and a condition backtest. No tool places, closes or modifies an order, and there is no withdrawal or transfer tool. Free accounts get 300 tool calls a day. I'm on the team behind TraderSpy. Thanks! |
|
Requesting initial GitHub MCP Registry onboarding for Doklad.ai, following the OSS-registry-first, manual-curation process described in this thread.
Doklad.ai is Czech invoicing software for freelancers and small companies. The server lets an assistant list, create, update and email invoices, get invoice PDFs, record received payments (a bookkeeping entry, it moves no money), manage customers and expenses, and summarise invoice stats and cash flow. Access is granted per company on a consent page (owners and admins only), every call is audit-logged, and the rate limit is 60 requests per minute per company. Docs: https://doklad.ai/mcp-fakturace I run Doklad.ai. Thanks! |
|
Onboarding request for four servers, all active in the OSS registry:
Happy to provide anything else needed for review. Thanks! |
|
Requesting initial GitHub MCP Registry onboarding for Unified AI System, following the OSS-registry-first, manual-curation process described in this thread (I'm the project maintainer).
Two facts a reviewer can reproduce without installing anything, since a directory listing is only worth having if the artifact behaves:
Happy to supply anything else the review needs — a |
|
Requesting onboarding for
Thanks! |
|
Requesting initial GitHub MCP Registry onboarding for ZoneFoundry, following the OSS-registry-first, manual-curation process described in this thread. I'm the developer.
It controls the user's own Sonos speakers through the official Sonos cloud: play music, volume, grouping, moving playback between rooms, announcements and reminders. 27 tools; read-only tools carry |
Onboarding request: Norman MCP ServerHi GitHub MCP Registry team — requesting initial onboarding for Norman, following the OSS-registry-first and manual-curation process described in this discussion. Norman connects AI assistants to a user's accounting workspace for invoicing, expense and receipt management, bookkeeping, bank reconciliation, and German tax workflows.
The official registry entry has been active since February 19, 2026, but a search for Could the curation team consider adding Norman so subsequent registry versions can sync? Please let us know if you need any additional metadata or review information. Thank you! |
|
Requesting initial GitHub MCP Registry onboarding for Omentir, following the OSS-registry-first, manual-curation process described in this thread. I maintain the project.
What it does: lets an agent find and score LinkedIn prospects, draft outreach, run human-paced campaigns, and answer replies through an Omentir workspace. The agent never gets the user's LinkedIn password, and it cannot change billing or connect accounts. Thanks! |
|
Requesting initial GitHub MCP Registry onboarding for SourceMedium, following the OSS-registry-first, manual-curation process described in this thread. We publish and run this server.
Thank you! |
Hi @Wolfe-Jam, thanks for the thoughtful follow-up and for continuing to publish and validate your servers.
A few clarifications from our side: the GitHub MCP Registry now has the ability to sync versions from the open source registry, but onboarding a new server is still a manual curation process today. Once a server has been onboarded, newly published versions from the OSS registry should sync from there.
I’m closer to the technical side than the product/curation criteria, so I don’t want to overstate anything here. I’ll share your request with our product team and ask whether we’re able to move forward with onboarding them.
Thanks again for your patience, and for offering to help valid…