Skip to content

chore: add @j7nw4r and @SwayGom to messaging CODEOWNERS#7133

Open
j7nw4r wants to merge 1 commit into
Azure:mainfrom
j7nw4r:j7nw4r/add-messaging-codeowners
Open

chore: add @j7nw4r and @SwayGom to messaging CODEOWNERS#7133
j7nw4r wants to merge 1 commit into
Azure:mainfrom
j7nw4r:j7nw4r/add-messaging-codeowners

Conversation

@j7nw4r
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@j7nw4r j7nw4r commented May 22, 2026

Adding myself and my coworker @SwayGom to the Event Hubs and Service Bus CODEOWNERS lines (and the matching # ServiceOwners: comments that Azure SDK tooling reads). We're on the Microsoft messaging team and already own these surfaces in the other language SDKs.

No other entries changed.

@j7nw4r j7nw4r marked this pull request as ready for review May 22, 2026 17:17
@j7nw4r j7nw4r requested a review from RickWinter as a code owner May 22, 2026 17:17
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings May 22, 2026 17:17
@j7nw4r j7nw4r requested review from a team and ronniegeraghty as code owners May 22, 2026 17:17
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Updates the repository’s CODEOWNERS configuration for the messaging area by adding two additional owners to the Event Hubs entries, including the # ServiceOwners: comment that Azure SDK tooling consumes.

Changes:

  • Add @j7nw4r and @SwayGom to the /sdk/eventhubs/ CODEOWNERS rule.
  • Add the same owners to the corresponding %Event Hubs # ServiceOwners: comment for tooling consistency.

Comment thread .github/CODEOWNERS
Comment on lines 55 to +59
# PRLabel: %Event Hubs
/sdk/eventhubs/ @axisc @hmlam @sjkwak
/sdk/eventhubs/ @axisc @hmlam @sjkwak @j7nw4r @SwayGom

# ServiceLabel: %Event Hubs
# ServiceOwners: @axisc @hmlam @sjkwak
# ServiceOwners: @axisc @hmlam @sjkwak @j7nw4r @SwayGom
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants