test(problem): add regression tests for Problem.simulate()

[g-braeunlich]

Description

Add regression tests for Problem.simulate() which check against reference values.

Fixes #159

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

• Documentation only change (no code changed)
• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
• This change requires a documentation update

Checklist:

• I have run the pre-commit checks with pre-commit run --all-files
• I have run ruff check . and ruff format
• I have run mypy .
• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
• My changes generate no new warnings
• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
• New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes

Reviewer Checklist:

• The content of this PR brings value to the community. It is not too specific to a particular use case.
• The tests and checks pass (linting, formatting, type checking). For a new problem, double check the github actions workflow to ensure the problem is being tested.
• The documentation is updated.
• The code is understandable and commented. No large code blocks are left unexplained, no huge file. Can I read and understand the code easily?
• There is no merge conflict.
• The changes are not breaking the existing results (datasets, training curves, etc.). If they do, is there a good reason for it? And is the associated problem version bumped?
• For a new problem, has the dataset been generated with our slurm script so we can re-generate it if needed? (This also ensures that the problem is running on the HPC.)
• For bugfixes, it is a robust fix and not a hacky workaround.

[g-braeunlich]

Also added 2 maintenance commits:

• airfoil: numpy deprecated numpy.cross for 2D arrays
• ci: migrate to latest ruff action (old one wont be compatible anymore in the future)

[g-braeunlich]

Other points to discuss:

• Currently if no reference file is present, a warning is displayed to create a new file. Should that be an error instead?
• The tolerance (currently: rtol=5e-5) could be made problem specific. Should we do that?

[markfuge]

Overall LGTM. We can discuss the open points you mentioned briefly at the next biweekly.

[g-braeunlich]

@markfuge I now have implemented things as discussed:
If a reference file is missing, an error is raised with a message explaining on how to create the file.
Reference files are json files and also have a rtol parameter.