Conversation
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
|
Thanks for the quick fix, @Pringled. I checked this branch (
The full test suite passes on this branch as well (370 passed, Python 3.13, Linux). Dropping Verified with AI assistance. The results above are from real runs. |
stephantul
approved these changes
Oct 5, 2026
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
get_validated_cachetreated a file as stale only if its mtime was later than the cache save time, but a file changed during indexing, or restored with an older mtime was missed. We now check against the manifest entry which we also use for incremental rebuilding. This means we also don't needFileStatus.NEWERand thewrite_timeanymore.I also fixed two semi-related issue that greppie pointed out (but were already on main):
This PR resolves #279