Skip to content

How do we rank links? #9

Open
Open

Description

@Sandr0x00

What are trustworthy links? Why do we trust some links more than other ones? Who says that musicbrainz.org is more trusted than mymusicblog.wordpress.com? Do we say that? (For thousands of links?)

Activity

  1. self-assigned this
    on Mar 2, 2017
  2. pfent commented on Mar 3, 2017

    @pfent

    One of the most teached algorithms is HITS, where you have an "authority" value. Though not strictly a "trustworthyness" value, but might be an indicator for it

  3. simonzachau commented on Mar 5, 2017

    @simonzachau
    Contributor

    Maybe "an indicator for it" is the best we can get. How big would our focused subgraph then be for the HITS algorithm?
    E.g.: Pretend we want to score the following relationship only: (Beethoven - inspired by - Mozart) -> the sources stored at 'Beethoven' and 'Mozart' by Project A could be the limited root set. However, when we judge a source as a whole, are all sources in the database our root set? Consequently, we would then need to scrape 1 level deeper for the base set?

  4. pfent commented on Mar 5, 2017

    @pfent

    If we're using an optimized library (NetworkX is pretty good, but that's Python…), with all that power iteration eigenvector calculation magic, we can probably go pretty large with the focused subgraph, maybe even just use all relevant sources. But hard to tell without any measurements

    @sacdallago maybe you know a Javascript library similar to NetworkX?

  5. sacdallago commented on Mar 6, 2017

    @sacdallago
    Member

    @pfent I unfortunately don't :( But some NPM digging might make pretty things surface. One week ago I found two groups attempting to write CNNs in JS, so I'm fairly sure there's a package for everything :D :D

  6. simonzachau commented on Mar 6, 2017

    @simonzachau
    Contributor

    Our current idea:

    1. get all links in database (root set)
    2. scrape outgoing links (for base set)
    3. generate network of all database links
    4. HITS: our plan is to try to connect NetworkX to Nodejs
  7. vviro commented on Mar 6, 2017

    @vviro

    Regarding the ranking see also my comment at MusicConnectionMachine/RelationshipsG3#5 (comment)
    This would be a cool thing to try out, but it seems to me that ideally the time to approach this would be when we see that we really need this refinement and we need to get to this place first.

  8. sacdallago commented on Mar 6, 2017

    @sacdallago
    Member

    @simonzachau Spawning child processes and assign them jobs with other languages is always a bit of an overkill! Avoid that as much as possible, and really just do that if there is no other way.

  9. FelsyWaschbaer commented on Mar 6, 2017

    @FelsyWaschbaer
    Contributor
  10. sacdallago commented on Mar 7, 2017

    @sacdallago
    Member

    https://www.npmjs.com/package/graphology-hits was last published 2 weeks ago. What that tells me is that there is someone trying to do something similar and hasn't found a solution either, and that the package is being maintained (as opposed to the year old one).

  11. simonzachau commented on Mar 7, 2017

    @simonzachau
    Contributor

    @sacdallago thank you for reviewing our findings! That's why we also opted to try graphology-hits rather than the unmaintained ngraph.hits.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions