Skip to content

[Klaud Cold] Update dsv4-fp4-b200-vllm (+mtp) vLLM image to v0.21.0#1476

Open
functionstackx wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
update-dsv4-fp4-b200-vllm-v0.21.0
Open

[Klaud Cold] Update dsv4-fp4-b200-vllm (+mtp) vLLM image to v0.21.0#1476
functionstackx wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
update-dsv4-fp4-b200-vllm-v0.21.0

Conversation

@functionstackx
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

Update vLLM image from v0.20.0-cu130 (20d/18d old) to v0.21.0

Recipes touched: `dsv4-fp4-b200-vllm`, dsv4-fp4-b200-vllm-mtp

Test plan

  • full-sweep-enabled sweep passes.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Update vLLM image from v0.20.0-cu130 (20d/18d old) to v0.21.0

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thanks for the contribution! For vLLM & SGLang, please ensure that your recipes is similar to the official vLLM recipes and/or the SGLang cookbook

If it is not, please create a PR first before we can merge your single node PR into the master branch. Let's ensure that the documentation is first class such that the entire ML community can benefit from your hard work! Thank you

PR authors are responsible for ensuring that after merging, all GitHub Action jobs fully pass. A lot of the time, failures are just flakes and simply re-running the failed jobs will fix it. If re-running failed jobs is attempted, PR authors are responsible for ensuring it passes. See GitHub's docs on re-running failed jobs: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/how-tos/manage-workflow-runs/re-run-workflows-and-jobs#re-running-failed-jobs-in-a-workflow

As a rule of thumb, generally, PR authors should request a review & get a PR approval from the respective companies' CODEOWNERS before requesting a review from core maintainers.

If additional help is needed, PR authors can reach out to core maintainers over Slack.

1 similar comment
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thanks for the contribution! For vLLM & SGLang, please ensure that your recipes is similar to the official vLLM recipes and/or the SGLang cookbook

If it is not, please create a PR first before we can merge your single node PR into the master branch. Let's ensure that the documentation is first class such that the entire ML community can benefit from your hard work! Thank you

PR authors are responsible for ensuring that after merging, all GitHub Action jobs fully pass. A lot of the time, failures are just flakes and simply re-running the failed jobs will fix it. If re-running failed jobs is attempted, PR authors are responsible for ensuring it passes. See GitHub's docs on re-running failed jobs: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/how-tos/manage-workflow-runs/re-run-workflows-and-jobs#re-running-failed-jobs-in-a-workflow

As a rule of thumb, generally, PR authors should request a review & get a PR approval from the respective companies' CODEOWNERS before requesting a review from core maintainers.

If additional help is needed, PR authors can reach out to core maintainers over Slack.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@claude claude Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM — straightforward vLLM image version bump for two dsv4-fp4-b200-vllm recipes with matching perf-changelog entry.

Extended reasoning...

Overview

This PR bumps the vLLM container image from vllm/vllm-openai:v0.20.0-cu130 to vllm/vllm-openai:v0.21.0 for two recipes (dsv4-fp4-b200-vllm and dsv4-fp4-b200-vllm-mtp) in .github/configs/nvidia-master.yaml, and adds the corresponding entry to perf-changelog.yaml. The total diff is 4 lines of meaningful change across 2 files.

Security risks

None. This is a config-only change touching image tags in YAML. No code, auth, crypto, or permission surfaces are involved. The image source (vllm/vllm-openai) is unchanged — only the tag is updated.

Level of scrutiny

Minimal scrutiny appropriate. This is a mechanical, well-established pattern (image version bump) that matches the repo's many prior image-bump PRs (e.g., the SGLang bump in #1458 mentioned in recent commits). The changelog entry is correctly formatted and the pr-link matches PR #1476.

Other factors

No bugs were flagged by the bug-hunting system. The full-sweep-enabled label indicates the change will be validated by a full perf sweep before merge. No outstanding reviewer comments — only the standard recipe-reminder bot notes.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

Status: No status

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant