Skip to content

docs(dart): add dart docs#3560

Merged
chaokunyang merged 3 commits intoapache:mainfrom
chaokunyang:dart_docs
Apr 13, 2026
Merged

docs(dart): add dart docs#3560
chaokunyang merged 3 commits intoapache:mainfrom
chaokunyang:dart_docs

Conversation

@chaokunyang
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@chaokunyang chaokunyang commented Apr 13, 2026

Why?

What does this PR do?

add dart docs

Related issues

AI Contribution Checklist

  • Substantial AI assistance was used in this PR: yes / no
  • If yes, I included a completed AI Contribution Checklist in this PR description and the required AI Usage Disclosure.
  • If yes, my PR description includes the required ai_review summary and screenshot evidence of the final clean AI review results from both fresh reviewers on the current PR diff or current HEAD after the latest code changes.

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

  • Does this PR introduce any public API change?
  • Does this PR introduce any binary protocol compatibility change?

Benchmark

@chaokunyang chaokunyang merged commit 90a45dd into apache:main Apr 13, 2026
63 checks passed
chaokunyang added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 14, 2026
…3563)

## Why?
Fory struct deserialize in Dart was slower than it should be given
Fory's wire format.

## What does this PR do?

- Codegen emits direct read calls for statically safe struct/ext fields,
skipping runtime
flag and type switches (mirrors Java's ObjectCodecBuilder).
- Runtime replaces a one-key HashMap on ReadContext/WriteContext with a
dedicated field.
- Fixes benchmark workload file broken by the #3560 constructor
refactor.

## Related issues
 #3558 

## AI Contribution Checklist
- [ ] Substantial AI assistance was used in this PR: `yes` / `no`
- [ ] If `yes`, I included a completed [AI Contribution
Checklist](https://github.com/apache/fory/blob/main/AI_POLICY.md#9-contributor-checklist-for-ai-assisted-prs)
in this PR description and the required `AI Usage Disclosure`.
- [ ] If `yes`, my PR description includes the required `ai_review`
summary and screenshot evidence of the final clean AI review results
from both fresh reviewers on the current PR diff or current HEAD after
the latest code changes.

## Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
- [ ] Does this PR introduce any public API change?
- [ ] Does this PR introduce any binary protocol compatibility change?

## Benchmark

Co-authored-by: Shawn Yang <shawn.ck.yang@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants