Skip to content

docs: security section - #2888

Merged
TC-MO merged 19 commits into
masterfrom
docs/security-section
Sep 10, 2026
Merged

docs: security section#2888
TC-MO merged 19 commits into
masterfrom
docs/security-section

Conversation

@TC-MO

@TC-MO TC-MO commented Aug 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Splits the single security page into an overview, vulnerability disclosure policy, shared responsibility model, and platform architecture. New additions based on drafts from @filakovsky; the security whitepaper stays an external PDF that the docs link rather than duplicate.

@TC-MO
TC-MO requested a review from filakovsky August 18, 2026 12:17
@TC-MO TC-MO self-assigned this Aug 18, 2026
@TC-MO TC-MO added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation. t-docs Issues owned by technical writing team. labels Aug 18, 2026
@apify-service-account

apify-service-account commented Aug 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🗑️ Preview for this PR was deleted.

@TC-MO TC-MO changed the title Docs/security section docs: security section Aug 18, 2026

@filakovsky filakovsky left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like it, thanks @TC-MO !

TC-MO and others added 7 commits August 28, 2026 10:32
Split the standalone /security page into a multi-page section: an
overview hub at /security and the full vulnerability disclosure policy
at /security/vulnerability-disclosure. Add the security sidebar entry.
Preserve the /security#vulnerability-disclosure-policy anchor on the hub
so existing external links still resolve.
Add the shared responsibility model at /security/shared-responsibility
and link it from the security hub. Keep the security whitepaper as an
external PDF asset (linked, not duplicated in docs), matching the Actor
whitepaper precedent and how peers publish security whitepapers.
…page

Address review-docs findings: description lengths in range, drop article
before Apify Store, spell out Apify Proxy in the table, active voice, and
a missing-article grammar fix. Light prose tightening on the shared
responsibility page (independently verified as lossless).
Updated wording for clarity on Actor runtime isolation.
Add a technical overview of how the platform is built: control and
execution planes, the anatomy of an Actor run, workload isolation,
storage, and availability. Scope it to mechanism and link out to the
security pages for encryption, compliance, and data residency rather
than duplicating them. Link it from the Get started overview.
…fixes

Replace relative .md links and one hardcoded docs.apify.com URL with
absolute slugs, so internal links follow a single style that also works
for the SDK, CLI, and client docs served from other repos.

Apply the first standards review of the architecture page and security
hub: drop first-person 'our' from the hub, add missing image alt text,
fix list parallelism, replace unmeasured claims and passive voice where
the actor is known, and split sentences over the 30-word limit.
Satisfy the no-stacked-headings rule by introducing the customer and
shared responsibility sections before their subheadings.
@TC-MO
TC-MO force-pushed the docs/security-section branch from d81d5fd to fee4ff8 Compare August 28, 2026 08:36
TC-MO and others added 8 commits August 28, 2026 11:03
Run Actors and Build Actors are the two paths the overview points to.
Architecture completes that arc for a general audience, while agent
onboarding serves a narrower one and the overview already lists it under
common next steps rather than as a path.
The page now sits with the security pages it cross-references. Two links
that pointed back to the security overview target the shared
responsibility model and the vulnerability disclosure policy instead.
Architecture moved to the security section, so the reorder it prompted
no longer applies.
Give each fact one home. The design principles state intent, the cloud
infrastructure section states the configuration, and the availability
section states the consequence. Drop the residency reference the shared
responsibility model does not cover, and name the subject of the
orchestrator sentence.
… with a map

Three sections on the overview restated the sidebar in prose. Replace
them with a short list at the top, which also serves the markdown and
llms.txt outputs where no sidebar exists. Drop the secrets guidance the
shared responsibility model already covers, and split the opening
sentence that promised both how the platform is built and how it is
secured.
The dedupe pass treated an explanation and a headline claim as
repetition. Put back the gloss on Availability Zone, restore the
cross-account guarantee to the design principles where a reader skims
for it, and give the reporting address on the overview so a researcher
does not have to open another page to find it.
Drop the sentence that announced the page's audience, and name the actor
in four sentences where Apify or the platform does the work.
@TC-MO
TC-MO marked this pull request as ready for review September 3, 2026 09:52
@TC-MO
TC-MO requested a review from szaganek September 3, 2026 09:53

@szaganek szaganek left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not going to block it, so approved. I just hope you fix some of these things. There's a lot of filler here that makes it hard to read, a lot of "it's not X, it's Y", missing contractions, and generally repeated info that we could make more concise.

Comment thread sources/platform/get-started/index.mdx Outdated

Because every Actor shares this input > run > output model, they compose. One Actor's output can feed another, results flow into [integrations](/integrations) like Make, Zapier, or n8n, and you can call any Actor from your code like a regular API.

For how the platform itself is built - the control and execution planes, what happens during a run, and how workloads stay isolated - see [Platform architecture](/security/architecture).

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
For how the platform itself is built - the control and execution planes, what happens during a run, and how workloads stay isolated - see [Platform architecture](/security/architecture).
For how the platform is built, what happens during a run, and how workloads stay isolated, see [Platform architecture](/security/architecture).

Parenthetical like this one is unnecessary, keep it simple.

description: How the Apify platform is built - control and execution planes, what happens during an Actor run, how workloads stay isolated, and how storage works.
---

This page describes how the Apify platform is built: how it is structured, what happens when an Actor runs, how workloads stay isolated, and how data is stored.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
This page describes how the Apify platform is built: how it is structured, what happens when an Actor runs, how workloads stay isolated, and how data is stored.
Learn how the Apify platform is built: how it is structured, what happens when an Actor runs, how workloads stay isolated, and how data is stored.

Why describe the guide, when we can be more task-oriented?


This page describes how the Apify platform is built: how it is structured, what happens when an Actor runs, how workloads stay isolated, and how data is stored.

Security controls and the division of responsibilities are covered separately in the [shared responsibility model](/security/shared-responsibility) and the [Apify Security Whitepaper](https://apify.com/security-whitepaper.pdf).

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
Security controls and the division of responsibilities are covered separately in the [shared responsibility model](/security/shared-responsibility) and the [Apify Security Whitepaper](https://apify.com/security-whitepaper.pdf).
For security controls and the division of responsibilities, see [shared responsibility model](/security/shared-responsibility) and the [Apify Security Whitepaper](https://apify.com/security-whitepaper.pdf).

It's a good practice to avoid passive voice.


## Design principles

A few principles shape most of the decisions described below:

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This sentence says a lot of nothing. Whose decisions? Why directional language? Can we make it a proper intro?

- Control plane. Apify Console, the Apify API, and the supporting services. This is where you and your integrations manage Actors, tasks, schedules, storage, and billing.
- Execution plane. Actor runs execute here, together with the storage that holds their inputs and results.

The two planes run as separate systems. The execution plane still depends on the API to authenticate, read inputs, and store results. Every action a run takes against platform data therefore passes through the API's authorization checks rather than reaching storage directly.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

still, therefore, rather than -- that's all unnecessary AI filler. Can you try to rewrite in plain English?


The platform protects your data with redundancy, backups, and safeguards against accidental deletion:

- Redundancy. The data your Actors collect (datasets, key-value stores, request queues) lives in Amazon S3 and DynamoDB, replicated across multiple Availability Zones - S3 is designed for 99.999999999% (11 nines) durability. The primary database runs as a replicated cluster across zones too, so the loss of a node or zone loses no data.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

S3 is designed for 99.999999999% (11 nines) durability -- is this necessary?

The platform protects your data with redundancy, backups, and safeguards against accidental deletion:

- Redundancy. The data your Actors collect (datasets, key-value stores, request queues) lives in Amazon S3 and DynamoDB, replicated across multiple Availability Zones - S3 is designed for 99.999999999% (11 nines) durability. The primary database runs as a replicated cluster across zones too, so the loss of a node or zone loses no data.
- Backups. The primary database is backed up automatically by the managed database service it runs on. These backups let the platform recover from a serious failure; they are not an archive of individual accounts.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
- Backups. The primary database is backed up automatically by the managed database service it runs on. These backups let the platform recover from a serious failure; they are not an archive of individual accounts.
- Backups. The primary database is backed up automatically by the managed database service it runs on. These backups let the platform recover from a serious failure, they aren't an archive of individual accounts.


## Availability and resilience

The loss of a single Availability Zone - a physically separate data center within the region - does not take the platform down. Availability rests on several mechanisms:

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why a parenthetical again? Define the term first, then talk about the consequences.

Comment thread sources/platform/security/index.md Outdated
<img src={require("../images/security/soc2-logo.png").default} alt="SOC 2 Type II compliance badge" width="150" title="Apify SOC 2 Type II compliance" />
</a>

To learn more, read the [SOC 2 compliance announcement](https://blog.apify.com/apify-soc2/) and visit the [Trust Center](https://trust.apify.com) for additional information or to request the SOC 2 Type II report.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There's "to learn more" and "for additional information" in one sentence. It could be more concise.

Comment thread sources/platform/security/index.md Outdated

## Security whitepaper

For a comprehensive description of how the Apify platform is built and operated to protect your data, read the [Apify Security Whitepaper](https://apify.com/security-whitepaper.pdf).

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
For a comprehensive description of how the Apify platform is built and operated to protect your data, read the [Apify Security Whitepaper](https://apify.com/security-whitepaper.pdf).
For how the Apify platform is built and operated to protect your data, read the [Apify Security Whitepaper](https://apify.com/security-whitepaper.pdf).

Address the review on #2888: replace the empty opener to the design
principles, cut the parentheticals and the vague quantifiers, define
Availability Zone before stating what losing one means, and drop the
connectives that padded the two-planes paragraph.
…ty pages

The style guide asks for contractions and for consistency within a page,
so contract the declarative statements throughout rather than only the
two lines raised in review. Imperative warnings keep the full form.
Replace the S3 durability figure with a plain statement of high
durability, since we can't commit to the same numbers as our provider,
and cut the accidental-deletion sentence that repeated the safeguards
described before it.
The run walkthrough and the Apify Proxy section both explained that
target sites see proxy addresses, in slightly different words. Leave the
explanation with the proxy section and let the walkthrough name the step.
@TC-MO
TC-MO merged commit e8a06ab into master Sep 10, 2026
14 checks passed
@TC-MO
TC-MO deleted the docs/security-section branch September 10, 2026 11:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation Improvements or additions to documentation. t-docs Issues owned by technical writing team.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants