[material_ui] Set-up tool/gen_defaults sub-directory - #12469
Open
elliette wants to merge 4 commits into
Open
Conversation
Work towards flutter/flutter#186906 Adds the initial `gen_defaults` sub-directory with the initial `TokenTemplate` and generator. This is simply the initial scaffold, we will need to add additional helper functions as necessary as we begin adding the actual templates. - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [AI contribution guidelines] and understand my responsibilities, or I am not using AI tools. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [relevant style guides] and ran [the auto-formatter]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] The title of the PR starts with the name of the package surrounded by square brackets, e.g. `[shared_preferences]` - [x] I [linked to at least one issue that this PR fixes] in the description above. - [x] I followed [the version and CHANGELOG instructions], using [semantic versioning] and the [repository CHANGELOG style], or I have commented below to indicate which documented exception this PR falls under[^1]. - [x] I updated/added any relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or I have commented below to indicate which [test exemption] this PR falls under[^1]. - [ ] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. **Note**: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code Assist for GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code). Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed. [^1]: Regular contributors who have demonstrated familiarity with the repository guidelines only need to comment if the PR is not auto-exempted by repo tooling. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/packages/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md [AI contribution guidelines]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#ai-contribution-guidelines [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/master/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [relevant style guides]: https://github.com/flutter/packages/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#style [the auto-formatter]: https://github.com/flutter/packages/blob/main/script/tool/README.md#format-code [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/master/docs/contributing/Chat.md [linked to at least one issue that this PR fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/master/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [the version and CHANGELOG instructions]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/master/docs/ecosystem/contributing/README.md#version-and-changelog-updates [semantic versioning]: https://dart.dev/tools/pub/versioning#semantic-versions [repository CHANGELOG style]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/master/docs/ecosystem/contributing/README.md#changelog-style [test exemption]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/master/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests
github-actions
Bot
added
triage-framework
elliette
marked this pull request as ready for review
August 13, 2026 22:06
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a new gen_defaults tool under packages/material_ui/tool/gen_defaults to generate Material component theme data defaults from token data. It includes the generator script, base template classes, configuration files, and tests. Feedback suggests improving the robustness of the path resolution in materialLib by resolving paths relative to Platform.script instead of relying on the current working directory.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Ports over #11762 which landed on the
m3e_migrationfeature branch.Adds the initial gen_defaults sub-directory with the initial TokenTemplate and generator. This is simply the initial scaffold, we will need to add additional helper functions as necessary as we begin adding the actual templates.
Work towards flutter/flutter#186906
Pre-Review Checklist
[shared_preferences]///).If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on Discord.
Note: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of Gemini Code Assist for GitHub. Comments from the
gemini-code-assistbot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed.Footnotes
Regular contributors who have demonstrated familiarity with the repository guidelines only need to comment if the PR is not auto-exempted by repo tooling. ↩ ↩2