Skip to content

chore: update alpine base to 3.24 in kapacitor and chronograf#883

Open
karel-rehor wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
chore/update-alpine-base-image
Open

chore: update alpine base to 3.24 in kapacitor and chronograf#883
karel-rehor wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
chore/update-alpine-base-image

Conversation

@karel-rehor

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

In alpine Dockerfiles for kapacitor and chronograf, the base image is now set to the 3.24 release.

Smoke tested each new image locally with

  • a local docker build
  • run of the built image
  • verification of normal startup
  • in chronograf checked the UI wizard updated with "Welcome to the latest Chronograf..." message

for example.

$ cd ../../1.9/alpine/
$ docker build --tag chronograf:1.9-alpine-local .
$ docker run --name chronograf-1.9-alpine-test -p 8888:8888 chronograf:1.9-alpine-local
# verify application load in browser... 
$ docker rm chronograf-1.9-alpine-test 
$ docker rmi chronograf:1.9-alpine-local 
$ cd ../../1.10/alpine/

@karel-rehor karel-rehor requested a review from srebhan June 10, 2026 13:00

@jdstrand jdstrand left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the PR! It seems like this should be limited to currently supported releases and not historic. @srebhan - thoughts?

Also, what about influxdb, which was also listed in docker-library/official-images#21630 (comment)?

@srebhan

srebhan commented Jun 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I agree with @jdstrand that we should not update all versions. I would even extend this and request to update the base image with the next release of both Chronograf and Kapacitor to keep the existing images stable.

See #884 and #885 to remind us on the required update.

@karel-rehor what do you think?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants