docs: add node101 to MultiversX API external providers - #1208
Open
girginomer10 wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
girginomer10 wants to merge 1 commit into
girginomer10 wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of the pull request (what is new / what has changed)
Add node101's managed dedicated MultiversX node service to External Providers, following the existing Kepler description-and-link format. Describe REST API and gRPC access, operational features, and archive/testnet options available on request. Explicitly state that the service requires a paid plan and has no free public endpoint or free tier.
Sources:
Did you test the changes locally ?
Checked the entry against the current product page and existing provider format. Only the External Providers section changes; local patch application and exact-insertion comparison verified. Full site build and customer endpoint testing have not been run.
Did you regenerate static/llms.txt and static/llms-full.txt ? (happens at build time)
Which category (categories) does this pull request belong to?
Target: development, as required by the repository contribution guide.