[env_op_images] Add unit tests for verify_pulled_report_crio

[nemarjan]

Add focused unit coverage for CRI-O pulled report verification, including successful enrichment, cross-node evidence accounting, and failure when no logs are provided. Reuse shared test utilities with a local fallback so tests run in both collection-style and local environments.

Assisted-By: Cursor Code

[openshift-ci]

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

[nemarjan]

recheck

[nemarjan]

recheck

[evallesp]

LGTM in general, some questions.

[nemarjan]

recheck

[centosinfra-prod-github-app]

Build failed (check pipeline). Post recheck (without leading slash)
to rerun all jobs. Make sure the failure cause has been resolved before
you rerun jobs.

https://gateway-cloud-softwarefactory.apps.ocp.cloud.ci.centos.org/zuul/t/rdoproject.org/buildset/93243bde94aa407093b339db46f09f8d

✔️ openstack-k8s-operators-content-provider SUCCESS in 2h 11m 28s
✔️ podified-multinode-edpm-deployment-crc SUCCESS in 1h 29m 56s
✔️ cifmw-crc-podified-edpm-baremetal SUCCESS in 1h 31m 15s
✔️ cifmw-crc-podified-edpm-baremetal-minor-update SUCCESS in 1h 58m 23s
✔️ cifmw-pod-zuul-files SUCCESS in 7m 35s
✔️ noop SUCCESS in 0s
✔️ cifmw-pod-ansible-test SUCCESS in 11m 27s
❌ cifmw-pod-pre-commit FAILURE in 11m 27s
✔️ cifmw-molecule-env_op_images SUCCESS in 24m 29s

[evallesp]

/lgtm

[michburk]

Changes lgtm, but I do have one critique that isn't necessarily blocking:

It looks like this pr is making two changes:

1. Add the unit tests
2. Move the verify_pulled_report_crio.py file and use the fcqn for verify_pulled_report_crio

This isn't a huge set of changes, but I think generally we should keep commits focused on one set of changes at a time. For example, in the event we need to revert something, we can create one revert commit that can specifically target the exact broken changes, rather than trying to de-tangle a smaller subset of changes from a larger commit.

[nemarjan]

Changes lgtm, but I do have one critique that isn't necessarily blocking:

It looks like this pr is making two changes:

1. Add the unit tests
2. Move the verify_pulled_report_crio.py file and use the fcqn for verify_pulled_report_crio

This isn't a huge set of changes, but I think generally we should keep commits focused on one set of changes at a time. For example, in the event we need to revert something, we can create one revert commit that can specifically target the exact broken changes, rather than trying to de-tangle a smaller subset of changes from a larger commit.

Thanks for the feedback Michael, yes I agree with you also, when working with creation of unit test i realized the python script was better placed in modules as tests were not running in gate stage in the previous location so that was reason for movement , noted on best practices and will look to incorporate like that in future. Do you think we need take the approach you mentioned for this MR?

[michburk]

/lgtm
/approve

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: michburk

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [michburk]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment