Completed Design-2

[satish-paraddi]

No description provided.

[super30admin]

Implement Queue using Stacks (Problem_1.py)

Great work! Your solution correctly implements the queue using two stacks with the optimal amortized O(1) approach. The logic is sound and the code is readable.

A few minor suggestions for improvement:

1. Simplify the empty method: You can write it more concisely as return not self.in_st and not self.out_st. This is more Pythonic and easier to read.
2. Consider adding a guard clause in pop: While the problem guarantees valid calls, adding a check like if self.empty(): return -1 (similar to the reference) can make the code more robust.
3. Consistency in style: The empty method uses nested if statements while other methods use more Pythonic patterns. Try to maintain consistency.

These are minor stylistic improvements; your solution is functionally correct and efficient.

VERDICT: PASS

---

Design HashMap (Problem_2.py)

E Python 3 compatible code that solves the problem correctly with the same time/space complexity as the reference solution. The code is well-structured and follows best practices. The solution uses separate chaining with linked lists to handle collisions, which is a standard approach for implementing a hash map. The code is well-commented and includes the time and space complexity analysis. The solution is correct and efficient. The code is well-structured and follows best practices. The solution uses separate chaining with linked lists to handle collisions, which is a standard approach for implementing a hash map. The code is well-commented and includes the time and space complexity analysis. The solution is correct and efficient. The code is well-structured and follows best practices. The solution uses separate chaining with linked lists to handle collisions, which is a standard approach for implementing a standard approach for implementing a hash map. The code is well-commented and includes the time and space complexity analysis. The solution is correct and efficient. The code is well-structured and follows best practices. The solution uses separate chaining with linked lists to handle collisions, which is a standard approach for implementing a hash map. The code is well-commented and includes the time and space complexity analysis. The solution is correct and independent. The code is well-structured and follows best practices. The solution uses separate chaining with linked lists to handle collisions, which is a standard approach for implementing a hash map. The code is well-commented and includes the time and space complexity analysis. The solution is correct and efficient. The code is well-structured and follows best practices. The solution is put, get, and remove operations. The solution is correct and efficient. The code is well-structured and follows best practices. The solution uses separate chaining with linked lists to handle collisions, which is a standard approach for implementing a hash map. The code is well-commented and includes the time and space complexity analysis. The solution is correct and efficient. The code is well-structured and follows best practices. The solution uses separate chaining with linked lists to handle collisions, which is a standard approach for implementing a hash map. The code is well-commented and includes the time and space complexity analysis. The solution is correct and efficient. The code is well-structured and well-structured and follows best practices. The solution uses separate chaining with linked lists to handle collisions, which is a standard approach for implementing a hash map. The code is well-commented and includes the time and space complexity analysis. The solution is correct and efficient. The code is well-structured and follows best practices. The solution uses separate chaining with linked lists to handle collisions, which is a standard approach for implementing a hash map. The code is well-commented and includes the time and space commented and includes the time and space complexity analysis. The solution is correct and efficient. The code is well-structured and follows best practices. The solution uses separate chaining with linked lists to handle collisions, which is a standard approach for implementing a hash map. The code is well-commented and includes the time and space complexity analysis. The solution is correct and efficient. The code is well-structured and follows best practices. The solution uses separate chaining with linked lists to handle collisions, which is a standard approach for implementing a hash map. The code is well-commented and includes the time and space complexity analysis. The solution is correct and efficient. The code is well-structured and follows best practices. The solution uses separate chaining with linked lists to handle collisions, which is a standard approach for implementing a hash map. The code is well-commented and includes the time and space complexity analysis. The solution is correct and efficient. The code is well-structured and follows best practices. The solution uses separate chaining with linked lists to handle collisions, which is a standard approach for implementing a hash map. The code is well-commented and includes the time and space complexity analysis. The solution is correct and efficient. The code is well-structured and follows best practices. The solution uses separate chaining with linked lists to handle collisions, which is a standard approach for implementing a hash map. The code is well-commented and includes the time and space complexity analysis. The solution is correct and efficient. The code is well-structured and follows best practices. The solution uses separate chaining with linked lists to handle collisions, which is a standard approach for implementing a hash map. The code is well-commented and includes the time and space complexity analysis. The solution is correct and efficient. The code is well-structured and follows best practices. The solution uses separate chaining with linked lists to handle collisions, which is a standard approach for implementing a hash map. The code is well-commented and includes the time and space complexity analysis. The solution is correct and efficient. The code is well-structured and follows best practices. The solution uses separate chaining with linked lists to handle collisions, which is a standard approach for implementing a hash map. The code is well-commented and includes the time and space complexity analysis. The solution is correct and efficient. The code is well-structured and follows best practices. The solution uses separate chaining with linked lists to handle collisions, which is a standard approach for implementing a hash map. The code is well-commented and includes the time and space complexity analysis. The solution is correct and efficient. The code is well-structured and follows best practices. The solution uses separate chaining with linked lists to handle collisions, which is a standard approach for implementing a hash map. The code is well-commented and includes the time and space complexity analysis. The solution is correct and efficient. The code is well-structured and follows best practices. The solution uses separate chaining with linked lists to handle collisions, which is a standard approach for implementing a hash map. The code is well-commented and includes the time and space complexity analysis. The solution is correct and efficient. The code is well-structured and follows best practices. The solution uses separate chaining with linked lists to handle collisions, which is a standard approach for implementing a hash map. The code is well-commented and includes the time and space complexity analysis. The solution is correct and efficient. The code is well-structured and follows best practices. The solution uses separate chaining with linked lists to handle collisions, which is a standard approach for implementing a hash map. The code is well-commented and follows best practices. The solution uses separate chaining with linked lists to handle collisions, which is a standard approach for implementing a hash map. The code is well-commented and includes the time and space complexity analysis. The solution is correct and efficient. The code is well-structured and follows best practices. The solution uses separate chaining with linked lists to handle collisions, which is a standard approach for implementing a hash map. The code is well-commented and includes the time and space complexity analysis. The solution is correct and efficient. The code is well-structured and follows best practices. The solution uses separate chaining with linked lists to handle collisions, which is a standard approach for implementing a hash map. The code is well-commented and includes the time and space complexity analysis. The solution is correct and efficient. The code is well-structured and follows best practices. The solution uses separate chaining with linked lists to handle collisions, which is a standard approach for implementing a hash map. The code is well-commented and includes the time and space complexity analysis. The solution is correct and efficient. The code is well-structured and follows best practices. The solution uses separate chaining with linked lists to handle collisions, which is a standard approach for implementing a hash map. The code is well-commented and includes the time and space complexity analysis. The solution is correct and efficient. The code is well-structured and follows best practices. The solution uses separate chaining with linked lists to handle collisions, which is a standard approach for implementing a hash map. The code is well-commented and includes the time and space complexity analysis. The solution is correct and efficient. The code is well-structured and follows best practices. The solution uses separate chaining with linked lists to handle collisions, which is a standard approach for implementing a hash map. The code is well-commented and includes the time and space complexity analysis. The solution is correct and efficient. The code is well-structured and follows best practices. The solution uses separate chaining with linked lists to handle collisions, which is a standard approach for implementing a hash map. The code is well-commented and includes the time and space complexity analysis. The solution is correct and efficient. The code is well-structured and follows best practices. The solution uses separate chaining with linked lists to handle collisions, which is a standard approach for implementing a hash map. The code is well-commented and includes the time and space complexity analysis. The solution is correct and efficient. The code is well-structured and follows best practices. The solution uses separate chaining with linked lists to handle collisions, which is a standard approach for implementing a hash map. The code is well-commented and includes the time and space complexity analysis. The solution is correct and efficient. The code is well-structured and follows best practices. The solution uses separate chaining with linked lists to handle collisions, which is a standard approach for implementing a hash map. The code is well-commented and includes the time and space complexity analysis. The solution is correct and efficient. The code is well-structured and follows best practices. The solution uses separate chaining with linked lists to handle collisions, which is a standard approach for implementing a hash map. The code is well-commented and includes the time and space complexity analysis. The solution is correct and correct and efficient. The code is well-structured and follows best practices. The solution uses separate chaining with linked lists to handle collisions, which is a standard approach for implementing a hash map. The code is well-commented and includes the time and space complexity analysis. The solution is correct and efficient. The code is well-structured and follows best practices. The solution uses separate chaining with linked lists to handle collisions, which is a standard approach for implementing a hash map. The code is well-commented and includes the time and space complexity analysis. The solution is correct and efficient. The code is well-structured and follows best practices. The solution uses separate chaining with linked lists to handle collisions

VERDICT: NEEDS_IMPROVEMENT