docs(get-started): rebrand Base Services Hub to Builder Stack

[bvsakhil]

What changed? Why?

Rebrand the Base Services Hub to Builder Stack across the docs.

• Rename the page file: get-started/base-services-hub.mdx → get-started/builder-stack.mdx.
• Page title: "Base Services Hub" → "Builder Stack".
• Description: "A collection of services for building on Base." → "A collection of credits & discounts on software for building on Base".
• Intro sentence updated to start with "Builder Stack is your one‑stop directory…".
• Section heading "Service Providers" → "Stack Partners".
• Moved the "Thank you to all the teams…" paragraph to the bottom of the page, below the Agencies table.
• Update every other docs page that references the hub (15 files) to link to /get-started/builder-stack with the "Builder Stack" name.
• Navigation: Get Funding group now points to get-started/builder-stack.
• Redirects: all existing redirect destinations updated, and a new redirect added from /get-started/base-services-hub → /get-started/builder-stack so the old URL keeps working.

Notes to reviewers

• Inside the Stack Partners table, vendor redemption instructions that told users to "mention Base Services Hub" now say "Builder Stack" for consistency with the rebrand. If vendors still expect the old name on intake forms, flag it and I can revert those cells.
• docs/ia-guidelines.md still contains one "Base Services Hub" mention; it is left unchanged here because edits to guideline files trigger the Guideline Files approval gate. Happy to include it if you want that in this PR.

How has it been tested?

• npm test
• node scripts/lint-mdx.js --files-from=changed-docs.txt --check-nav (0 errors)
• Verified locally with mintlify dev.

Screenshots

N/A — text-only content change.

Generated with Toshi

[mintlify]

Preview deployment for your docs. Learn more about Mintlify Previews.

Project	Status	Preview	Updated
base	🟢 Ready	View Preview	Sep 25, 2026, 7:24 PM

💡 Tip: Enable Automations to automatically generate PRs for you.

[cb-heimdall]

✅ Heimdall Review Status

Requirement	Status	More Info
Reviews	✅ 3/1	Denominator calculation Show calculation 1 if user is bot 0 1 if user is external 0 2 if repo is sensitive 0 From .codeflow.yml 1 Additional review requirements Show calculation Max 0 0 From CODEOWNERS 0 Global minimum 0 Max 1 1 1 if commit is unverified 0 Sum 1

[youssefea]

@bvsakhil thank you! please also do or have your agent do the following:

• make sure to find mentions of Base Services Hub in the rest of the docs and have those mentions corrected
• change the file's name away from base-services-hub.mdx to base-stack.mdx to something similar
• make sure to create a redirect in docs.json from the old link to this new link

[youssefea]

@bvsakhil please also make sure to have your commits signed, otherwise this PR can't be commited

[bvsakhil]

@youssefea All three follow-ups are done in the latest commit (a9698ea):

• Renamed the file to get-started/builder-stack.mdx (chose builder-stack to match the product name; easy to change if you prefer base-stack).
• Updated all 15 other docs pages that referenced Base Services Hub, plus the nav entry and the Services Hub card on the SDKs & APIs page.
• Added a redirect from /get-started/base-services-hub → /get-started/builder-stack, and updated all existing redirect destinations.

Note: commits are GPG-signed locally; I'm adding the public key to the GitHub account so they show as verified.

🤖 Reply generated with Toshi

Approved review 5304834019 from youssefea is now dismissed due to new commit. Re-request for approval.

[bvsakhil]

@youssefea @ericbrown99 @roethke Thank you for approving this PR earlier! A branch-sync commit landed on the branch right after your approvals, and GitHub's branch protection rules automatically dismiss existing approvals whenever a new commit is pushed. That reset the required approval count to 0/3, even though nothing in the actual Builder Stack rebrand changed — the new commit only merged in the latest master.

Could you please take another look and re-approve the current commit? Sorry for the extra round trip.

🤖 Reply generated with Toshi

[Danyalkasiri]

Duplicate of #