feat: server function inspector

[lxsmnsyc]

PR Checklist

Server function inspector, keeps track of server function calls and allows you to inspect both Response and Request easier (than viewing the network tab).

Some TODOs:

• renderer for seroval plugins
• multipart/form-data inspector
• Hex/base64/Text Viewer for ArrayBuffer and other content-types
• more Request/Response info (e.g. timing, request options, etc.)

Also some UI cleanup to dedupe stuff from the current DevOverlay

Testing

The overlay isn't visually-accessible for now so if you want to open it, go to Console then enter __START_SERVER_FN__(true)

The inspector is now available in the reworked dev overlay. Design is still to be finalized.

Note

seroval branch doesn't depend on this one, I can rebase this to main when that happens

[changeset-bot]

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 204e0f7

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 1 package

Name	Type
@solidjs/start	Minor

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for solid-start-landing-page ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	204e0f7
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/projects/solid-start-landing-page/deploys/6a5fb8c86706d900087afc98
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-2049--solid-start-landing-page.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.
🤖 Make changes	Run an agent on this branch

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

[pkg-pr-new]

Open in StackBlitz

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@solidjs/start@2049

commit: 204e0f7

[brenelz]

Do we just go ahead with this. I feel its pretty isolated

[lxsmnsyc]

@brenelz yes exactly, it's supposed to be non-blocking. I'm planning on working on the new superfeature for the dev overlay on a separate branch.

[brenelz]

Failing tests... Can probably get this merged soon after

[lxsmnsyc]

@brenelz the PR isn't final so it's expected. I don't think I can finalize this before stable, but I'll still try.

[brenelz]

Can maybe target 3.0 then. Thats fine

[lxsmnsyc]

no not 3.0. This is going to ship in 2.0 perhaps in a minor release, just not the RC

[birkskyum]

Changeset missing.

[birkskyum]

Oh, @lxsmnsyc , sorry if this went in too early - I see your comment now above all the rebase lines that you didn't want this in 2.0, but i got confused about the title being "feat(2.0)". Should we revert ( #2226 )? How far is this towards completion?

[lxsmnsyc]

@birkskyum this is meant to be part of 2.0

[birkskyum]

Great, and regarding the main branch, how would you prefer we proceed? do we make a revert, or will you make a follow-up pr with the remaining changes, or is this feature already finished?